Things that went well

• organized ++++++

• cared for +++

• not confused ++

• discussions +++ (electrifying)

• idea sharing

• reading

• publicity

• scheduling

• positive spirit +

• had the best time

• friendly, welcoming, loving, caring people ++

• amazing experience, instantiation of DIY

• process of decision making

• appreciate appreciation

• being with a group of people taking on leadership roles

• only interruptions about being excited, not corrective

• engaged, supportive people

• nice to be in a productive meeting

• action plans, outcomes +

• went smoothly

• felt relaxed +

• collected, collaborative learning

• Kelly’s introduction and framing

• theracane, self-care +

• food & coffee +

• can use library words and not have to explain why zines are important

• be with people who share problems

• not scheduled a whole long day +

• length of the conference: two whole days

• evening activities

• collegiality, among people with diverse activities and tactics

• schedule, in general

• awesome

• show & tell, hear how different people teach

• stronger archives/MSS presence

• did not cry in front of Honor

• serenaded in the dorm

Things that could have gone better

• checked out this afternoon

• description along with titles of sessions, names were vague, identify proposer +

• morning session on 2nd day +

• travel grant fiasco

• needed people taking stack

• acronyms, cataloging terms

• more people to take on facilitation and note-taking roles

• some hack time, not enough hours in the day

• forgot computer

• timeline action plans

• jumping jacks or chair yoga

• could have used scheduled breaks

• could have been better prepared for session they led

• marker all over hands

• blank google docs started for notes

• remote participation