Digitization and Ethics

Revision for “Digitization and Ethics” created on July 31, 2019 @ 10:16:41

Digitization and Ethics
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Friday July 19</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Breakout session 1, 10:15- 11:30am</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Session name: Digitization and Ethics</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Facilitator: Milo Miller</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Note taker: Honor Moody </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Twitter threads: </span><a href="https://twitter.com/SpookyColbert/status/1152254325965479936?s=20"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://twitter.com/SpookyColbert/status/1152254325965479936?s=20</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span> <a href="https://twitter.com/GinaMurrell1/status/1152254947041267712"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://twitter.com/GinaMurrell1/status/1152254947041267712</span></a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Framing: ongoing topic of interest in zine library community</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Original edition of code of ethics (ages ago); we’ve been trying to revisit this living doc at zine librarians unconference</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Last year decided to do a special appendix re digitization; Kelly Wooten/Milo Miller on it, but life happens, passed on torch recently to Kathryn La Barre (UIUC); Jeremy Brett : [get the link to the draft they’ve developed] Here it is ! &gt;&gt; </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c5YtSToyntGXDslG8euQLE9v27aH4J19HUkx_-LA5QI/edit?usp=sharing"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c5YtSToyntGXDslG8euQLE9v27aH4J19HUkx_-LA5QI/edit?usp=sharing</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></li> </ul> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Call to reserve 15-30 minutes to discuss take down requests</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">QZAP’s primary focus/mission is digitization, so likely has different concerns/approach than others</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Two main reasons for dig: 1. Preservation 2. Wider access</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Cons: [more complicated, see draft] privacy; unanticipated use for material created in pre-internet  world; alters experience of resource designed for analog use; respecting rights/desires of zine creators</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Sales of zine when digitization makes access?</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Currently onus on creator to set limits for reuse, not really possible for older zines;</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">QZAP tries to ask permission at point of permission</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Do we have an obligation/desire as zine librarians to do community education on rights statements/specific framings for digitization</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Best practices? Alex Wrekk’s Stolen Sharpie Revolution has good stuff (but not online!)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Suggest instead zineibrarians.info or appendix to code of ethics</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Why are we treating zines differently than other published work?</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Many zines are orphan works, QZAP does research to find creators, but also broadly interprets fair use, has very clear take down policies, </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">For orphan works, some decisions based genre (no for perzines, yes for cookzines)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Code of ethics evolved to protect the creator as much or more than an institutional needs</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Ethics for digitization can be contextual: community embedded zine libraries have different responsibilities/expectations than big institutions </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Slight shift: </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">An individual is contacting libraries requesting that their zine (from the 90s) requesting that they be shredded or returned (zinester provides postage)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Also, what about folks who zines are donated by a person other than the creator</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">MM: Strong feeling that once you release a creative work out into the world, you lose control; lacking a statement this zine is for jane schmo, if not held by her destroy or return:</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Archives have tradition and best practice for sensitive material/take down</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Does the cultural memory of zinekind live and die on any single zine? Probably not</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Attitude of person sometimes affects response (if feeling like one is bullied less responsive than if apologetic)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Can policies be analogous to public library book challenges policies</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">May also depend on relative openness of collection</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Q: do the same concerns apply if the zine is created not for sale, but academic event?</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Ingest forms are a real thing that we should use:</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Action: develop appendixes to appendix: sample forms: ingest for zine created at zine making event; at time of purchase; for donors (are you the creator? Do you have contact for the creator, etc.)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Moratoriums: Need date attached to rights and restrictions for </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Distinction between moratorium on access to material vs. moratorium on access to metadata</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Personally identifying information: current issue with atomization of data description</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Some of this is tied to ethics of data/technology </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;"> Ethics in linked data as part of Linked Data for Libraries community: </span><a href="https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/LD4P2/Ethics+in+Linked+Data+Affinity+Group"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/LD4P2/Ethics+in+Linked+Data+Affinity+Group</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (minimal info)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">June meeting notes: </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IYRnBxMOuyfsMK6hP38FwMtT4_IUAQFVZU12IAYYKgg/edit#heading=h.nzjy1x2ztkpx"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IYRnBxMOuyfsMK6hP38FwMtT4_IUAQFVZU12IAYYKgg/edit#heading=h.nzjy1x2ztkpx</span></a> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Email Itza Carbajal to request slack (confirming with Itza that this is ok)</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Complete vs partial/cover: anyone have thoughts on this</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Teal Triggs we make zines cover image usage controversy, see </span> <a href="https://alexwrekk.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/fazines-by-teal-triggs-and-why-you-should-not-buy-the-book/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://alexwrekk.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/fazines-by-teal-triggs-and-why-you-should-not-buy-the-book/</span></a> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Digitization doesn’t mean providing access to digital copies</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span> &nbsp;

OldNewDate CreatedAuthorActions
July 31, 2019 @ 10:16:41 Juli
July 31, 2019 @ 10:16:28 [Autosave] Juli
July 31, 2019 @ 10:08:05 Juli